Well, it looks like it's here....the biggest liberal money grab in history. Last week Obama came out and said, "Government is the answer." Yep, spoken like a true communist! Hugo Chavez and his other communist buddies must be so proud.
Obama's near total lack of leadership experience is starting to show. His paper thin resume was laughable on the campaign, and now it's downright frightening how much worse he can make our economy with this new socialism. (Liberals just covered their ears on the campaign trail when the facts showed that Sarah Palin had more executive experience than Obama!)
I've said it before and I'll say it again, this is the worst economy since the Carter Administation, and not the Great Depression. If liberals say otherwise, they're either really ignorant or they're using a scare tactic.
Now the tax & spend crazy liberals are finally running free in DC!! Crazy liberals will learn really quick that voting for a President just because he's black was not a smart thing to do at all. It's impossible to convince liberals that throwing money at a problem is extremely short term and cannot permanently fix anything. We need the government to not take so much away from people, in other words, tax cuts!
For crazy liberals, life simply isn't fair. They have no idea how to make more money or to become rich so they spend all their energy tearing down the lifestyles of those who've actually made it. And the rich Democratic leaders? They're holding on to a power base. Hey, don't kid yourselves....these hacks need "victims" and "angry people" to vote for them!
Simple fact: Rich people spend a lot of money and create a lot of jobs. Tax them more just because their rich, and you see spending in a community drop and jobs start to dwindle. Having tax cuts for making money is a GREAT incentive for trying to achieve even more (hey crazy liberals, go look up that word, incentive). Liberals simply hate rich people, well they're about to experience buyers remorse when everything they thought would happen....doesn't.
Monday, February 16, 2009
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Rich people are the enemy
Boy there's so much subject matter in the political world I could write about, but one thing stuck out today that I'd like to bring up.
An article on the Reuters website talks about a meeting between Congressman Brad Sherman (d) California, and auto company executives in Washington D.C.
According to the article The Congressman asked the Executives if they would be willing to give up and sell their private jets, the very ones they used to fly into Washington. No one raised their hands.
Now I understand why crazy liberals would want "rich" executives to give up their expensive "toys." To crazy liberals this is all 'feel good' stuff. Rich people are always the enemy to these crazy liberals.
Here's what I see....
Thousands of people are employed building and assembling these airplanes. Hundreds of people are employed servicing, maintaining, and piloting these airplanes. There are landing and take-off fees every time these planes come and go from airports. These airports, many of which do most of their business with private jets, use that income to pay the airport employees. What it comes down to is that there are A LOT of "little guys" that are employed and feed their families of this one industry. There would be thousands hurt and out of work if this Congressman gets his way.
Congressman Brad Sherman is being extremely irresponsible by trying to satisfy his crazy liberal friends in California. It just goes to show that liberalism is based mostly on emotion and feelings rather than actually working with economic facts.
Here is a link to the article: http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4AI8C520081119
An article on the Reuters website talks about a meeting between Congressman Brad Sherman (d) California, and auto company executives in Washington D.C.
According to the article The Congressman asked the Executives if they would be willing to give up and sell their private jets, the very ones they used to fly into Washington. No one raised their hands.
Now I understand why crazy liberals would want "rich" executives to give up their expensive "toys." To crazy liberals this is all 'feel good' stuff. Rich people are always the enemy to these crazy liberals.
Here's what I see....
Thousands of people are employed building and assembling these airplanes. Hundreds of people are employed servicing, maintaining, and piloting these airplanes. There are landing and take-off fees every time these planes come and go from airports. These airports, many of which do most of their business with private jets, use that income to pay the airport employees. What it comes down to is that there are A LOT of "little guys" that are employed and feed their families of this one industry. There would be thousands hurt and out of work if this Congressman gets his way.
Congressman Brad Sherman is being extremely irresponsible by trying to satisfy his crazy liberal friends in California. It just goes to show that liberalism is based mostly on emotion and feelings rather than actually working with economic facts.
Here is a link to the article: http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4AI8C520081119
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
People will believe anything. Part II
I should have known! If Obama's top economic guy says it, then it comes from Obama himself. Yesterday's entry makes mention that crazy liberals think we're in the worst depression since the Great Depression. Well after watching last night's news conference that Obama held, I can see that crazy liberals are only repeating what Obama actually says.
As I said yesterday....yes we are in a depression, but it is NOTHING like the Great Depression. Last night Obama kept referencing "Elkhart Indiana" as having 15% unemployment (or did he say 14%? somebody correct me). Back in the days of the actual Great Depression unemployment regularly ran at about 25%, and this went on for years.
TRUTH: This is the worst economic situation since the Carter Administration. Look up the numbers, it's not hard to do.
Better than 90% of President Bush's term saw steady economic growth. Then the housing and mortgage lending industries started teetering, and who ran the Senate and Congressional Banking Committees?? None other than Chris Dodd and and that cartoon character Barney Frank. These guys are hacks and cowards. They are too chicken to publicly admit that their leadership roles have failed the American people. Crazy liberals want to point fingers at Bush when Bush promoted policies that promoted growth. All the while Dodd and Frank ran their Tammany Hall banking committee benefiting themselves and their buddies. Oh and did anyone else know that the second biggest person to profit from the Countrywide Mortgage fiasco was none other than Barack Obama???
The democrats ruined the economy and Barack Obama's big swirly eyes (you know, like in Jungle book!) had everyone believing that it was Bush's fault. Yes, people will believe anything.
Chris Dodd should be sent to a hard labor work camp to pay back the American people and Barney Frank should be sent to a freak show where he can earn some cash to pay us back too! Hey crazy liberals, do you think I'm kidding about Barney Frank and a freak show?? Just watch this guy talk for five minutes. I myself can't last more than five minutes before I start laughing so hard I pee my pants!!!
As I said yesterday....yes we are in a depression, but it is NOTHING like the Great Depression. Last night Obama kept referencing "Elkhart Indiana" as having 15% unemployment (or did he say 14%? somebody correct me). Back in the days of the actual Great Depression unemployment regularly ran at about 25%, and this went on for years.
TRUTH: This is the worst economic situation since the Carter Administration. Look up the numbers, it's not hard to do.
Better than 90% of President Bush's term saw steady economic growth. Then the housing and mortgage lending industries started teetering, and who ran the Senate and Congressional Banking Committees?? None other than Chris Dodd and and that cartoon character Barney Frank. These guys are hacks and cowards. They are too chicken to publicly admit that their leadership roles have failed the American people. Crazy liberals want to point fingers at Bush when Bush promoted policies that promoted growth. All the while Dodd and Frank ran their Tammany Hall banking committee benefiting themselves and their buddies. Oh and did anyone else know that the second biggest person to profit from the Countrywide Mortgage fiasco was none other than Barack Obama???
The democrats ruined the economy and Barack Obama's big swirly eyes (you know, like in Jungle book!) had everyone believing that it was Bush's fault. Yes, people will believe anything.
Chris Dodd should be sent to a hard labor work camp to pay back the American people and Barney Frank should be sent to a freak show where he can earn some cash to pay us back too! Hey crazy liberals, do you think I'm kidding about Barney Frank and a freak show?? Just watch this guy talk for five minutes. I myself can't last more than five minutes before I start laughing so hard I pee my pants!!!
Monday, February 9, 2009
People will believe anything
Democrats and most of the American public, it seems, are just flat out gullible! Seriously! These people will pretty much believe anything coming from this Presidency.
On Fox News Sunday Mike Wallace interviewed Larry Summers, Barack Obama's number one man on the economy, and he said something that you would have to be uneducated and gullible to to get. Larry Summers said, "this is the worst economic situation since the Great Depression."
LISTEN UP EVERYONE!! Let's examine the FACTS: In the early 1930's the unemployment rate fluctuated at around 25%. Currently the unemployment rate is about 7% to 9% (in some places it's higher, and in others it is lower). Larry Summers should have said: "This is the worst economic situation since the Carter Administration!" That fact is more accurate. Please people, don't take everything at face value. Look things up, and do the research for yourselves. The unemployment rate of the late 1970's looks more like today according to historical data.
There is no doubt that we're in a slump. But those who are old enough to remember how things were back in the Depression days know that we have things MUCH BETTER today. Just ask anyone from the "greatest generation." They'll tell you.
Barack Obama has enormous eyes that swirl (like that snake in Jungle Book) and he's fooled so many people. I for one will think for myself and not fall for any of it.
On Fox News Sunday Mike Wallace interviewed Larry Summers, Barack Obama's number one man on the economy, and he said something that you would have to be uneducated and gullible to to get. Larry Summers said, "this is the worst economic situation since the Great Depression."
LISTEN UP EVERYONE!! Let's examine the FACTS: In the early 1930's the unemployment rate fluctuated at around 25%. Currently the unemployment rate is about 7% to 9% (in some places it's higher, and in others it is lower). Larry Summers should have said: "This is the worst economic situation since the Carter Administration!" That fact is more accurate. Please people, don't take everything at face value. Look things up, and do the research for yourselves. The unemployment rate of the late 1970's looks more like today according to historical data.
There is no doubt that we're in a slump. But those who are old enough to remember how things were back in the Depression days know that we have things MUCH BETTER today. Just ask anyone from the "greatest generation." They'll tell you.
Barack Obama has enormous eyes that swirl (like that snake in Jungle Book) and he's fooled so many people. I for one will think for myself and not fall for any of it.
Friday, February 6, 2009
Record snowfall in London--global warming??
In case anyone missed it, last week London England recorded a record snowfall. It was the largest recorded snowfall in decades. The same storm blanketed Ireland as well as most of western Europe. The picture I've included is a photograph of a London street.
How many more record snowfalls and record freezing tempuratures do we have to endure before crazy liberals realize that the whole global warming hype is just that....hype?
I could Blog for hours and create hundreds of paragraphs showing how most of this global warming "trend" is a load of crap. So I'll keep this one short. I will touch on this same subject from time to time.
I would like to at least say this: I in fact do believe that we as a human family need to be good stewards of the Earth. I think it is good to conserve (energy, or anything) and I think it is good to not pollute and dump garbage into our waterways. I also believe that it's wrong to churn out clouds of smoke into our atmosphere. But to say that we as human beings are actually raising the Earth's tempurature and changing it's climate is just a big money grab for feel-good crazy liberals. I say 'money grab' because most socialist governments (including those in our government) give out millions, even billions to "climate change" forums.
In future entries I will elaborate more on how bogus "global warming" really is.
To see the entire Wikipedia article click on this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_2009_United_Kingdom_and_Ireland_snowstorm
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Selective Listening
I thought deeply about what I would post the last few nights. As I have sifted through my emails (thank you, by the way) I have noticed a pattern, especially from those that have not been kind to me.
I will say this first, I LOVE IT when I get emails and comments. Especially the negative ones. Maybe it's a little twisted but I love to offend liberals! Besides the obvious left vs. right, I see two other things contained in the liberal's correspondence that are not found with Conservatives.
First, language. Almost without exception, the hate mail from liberals contain multiple four letter words like F*** and S***. It is very low-brow, repugnant, even "ghetto." They come off looking uneducated and illiterate. I myself (and most Conservatives) would never think of using such profane and foul language, it is simply beneath us. It's still fun to read because more than anything it shows their ugliness of character and it simply proves to me who these crazy liberals really are. Of course, Conservatives are not 100% squeaky clean, but it's obvious to EVERYONE who uses bad language more. You'd have to be blind and deaf to disagree, which brings me to my other topic....
I have noticed that Conservatives will listen to other Conservatives and they will listen to liberals. Liberals will listen to other liberals but they will not listen to Conservatives (in MOST cases). I recently received one correspondence from a liberal (thank you whoever you are) where he ranted and raved about the sidebar on my Blog where I list my heroes. It occurred to me that he probably has never heard Rush Limbaugh, or anyone else whom I've mentioned off to the side. Crazy liberals will say all kinds of terrible things about national Conservative commentators and the things they say make it very obvious that they may not have listened even for one minute to their shows. My own father (who I love) either tries to change the subject about Rush Limbaugh, or he'll say that Rush is "full of hot air." I've tried to tune the radio to the EIB Network so he can hear what Rush has to say, but then he refuses.
Rush Limbaugh is EXTREMELY successful because everything he says on his radio show he can back up with facts. And they're not just facts, they're facts he can either replay in a sound byte from the radio or TV, or it's a written quote from a notable newspaper. All other political commentators who have repeated this business model have themselves been very successful. In short, the truth will always win out. And that is what has driven liberals to become crazy liberals. They just choose not to listen. Hence the term Selective Listening.
Even during the party conventions of last year. I took time and listened to every speaker in the Democratic National Convention. I too saw the Greek god Apollo (Obama) descend down from the Heavens and speak from his marble column platform. I tried calling my liberal friends (yes, I have liberal friends!) to get them to watch it with me but they told me they were too busy that night gaming with their friends (I am not making that up!). When it came to the Republican National Convention, well....forget it!
I think liberals are too afraid that if they actually listened to Conservative commentators, or read their books, they would actually see the truth for what it is and they would come around and switch sides. But I think it's kind of a "clique-ish" thing for these liberals. They want to belong with their certain group of friends so they stay within their comfort zone. Let's face it, it's "trendy" to be liberal, even fashionable. They have plenty of Hollywood celebutards to look up to.
I will say this first, I LOVE IT when I get emails and comments. Especially the negative ones. Maybe it's a little twisted but I love to offend liberals! Besides the obvious left vs. right, I see two other things contained in the liberal's correspondence that are not found with Conservatives.
First, language. Almost without exception, the hate mail from liberals contain multiple four letter words like F*** and S***. It is very low-brow, repugnant, even "ghetto." They come off looking uneducated and illiterate. I myself (and most Conservatives) would never think of using such profane and foul language, it is simply beneath us. It's still fun to read because more than anything it shows their ugliness of character and it simply proves to me who these crazy liberals really are. Of course, Conservatives are not 100% squeaky clean, but it's obvious to EVERYONE who uses bad language more. You'd have to be blind and deaf to disagree, which brings me to my other topic....
I have noticed that Conservatives will listen to other Conservatives and they will listen to liberals. Liberals will listen to other liberals but they will not listen to Conservatives (in MOST cases). I recently received one correspondence from a liberal (thank you whoever you are) where he ranted and raved about the sidebar on my Blog where I list my heroes. It occurred to me that he probably has never heard Rush Limbaugh, or anyone else whom I've mentioned off to the side. Crazy liberals will say all kinds of terrible things about national Conservative commentators and the things they say make it very obvious that they may not have listened even for one minute to their shows. My own father (who I love) either tries to change the subject about Rush Limbaugh, or he'll say that Rush is "full of hot air." I've tried to tune the radio to the EIB Network so he can hear what Rush has to say, but then he refuses.
Rush Limbaugh is EXTREMELY successful because everything he says on his radio show he can back up with facts. And they're not just facts, they're facts he can either replay in a sound byte from the radio or TV, or it's a written quote from a notable newspaper. All other political commentators who have repeated this business model have themselves been very successful. In short, the truth will always win out. And that is what has driven liberals to become crazy liberals. They just choose not to listen. Hence the term Selective Listening.
Even during the party conventions of last year. I took time and listened to every speaker in the Democratic National Convention. I too saw the Greek god Apollo (Obama) descend down from the Heavens and speak from his marble column platform. I tried calling my liberal friends (yes, I have liberal friends!) to get them to watch it with me but they told me they were too busy that night gaming with their friends (I am not making that up!). When it came to the Republican National Convention, well....forget it!
I think liberals are too afraid that if they actually listened to Conservative commentators, or read their books, they would actually see the truth for what it is and they would come around and switch sides. But I think it's kind of a "clique-ish" thing for these liberals. They want to belong with their certain group of friends so they stay within their comfort zone. Let's face it, it's "trendy" to be liberal, even fashionable. They have plenty of Hollywood celebutards to look up to.
Monday, February 2, 2009
Proposition 8 in California and the LDS Church
Even though Proposition 8 defining a marriage only between a man and a woman already passed way back in November, it seems that crazy liberals simply have not stopped crying about the whole thing.
It looks like they are really bashing the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. This Church (aka the Mormon Church) has a very strong conservative view regarding family values. Anything that has anything to do with homosexuality, the Church is against. Of course, as it is with ANY religion in the U.S., they have the right to believe what they want, and to promote what they want.
Anyway, the people voted, gay marriage is illegal in California, and that should've been the end of it. BUT NO! The crazy liberals had to throw a massive temper tantrum!! (as they always do when they don't get their way). I guess the rule of law as it applies to civil elections is only valid when things go their way. It must be fun being a crazy liberal. You just have to be a loud mouth cry baby when you don't get your way. My three year old niece acts the EXACT same way when she doesn't get her way.
I guess they're upset at the LDS Church because they gave a lot of money to the cause of promoting this amendment. It is being made public that they gave (as a Church) a little over $100,000.00. Individual donations from members totaled about $20,000,000.00. What the crazy liberals need to know is that the LDS Church was one of MANY religious and private donors to this cause. The Catholic Church (for example) shares the same exact values as the LDS Church when it comes to family issues, and there are many more Catholics than Mormons. And who cares if the Church gave $100,000,000! It is their right to spend their money how they wish! It sounds like they're also upset that they couldn't get that much money themselves. I don't see how they couldn't. Don't these crazy liberals have George Soros, Ariana Huffington, and all the other wealthy Hollywood celebutards?? What about them? Were they just too cheap to donate to something they say they believe in?
It seems to me that this outcry agaisnt the Church is about more than just Prop 8. The LDS Church is extremely conservative on pretty much every issue you can think of. It is very difficult to be a liberal and to be a member of this Church (I have no idea how Senator Harry Reed does it). It looks like this is a great way for crazy liberals to lash out agaisnt an organization that they may have already hated for years.
Crazy liberals lost this one. They need to stop crying! Do we need some pacifiers?
It looks like they are really bashing the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. This Church (aka the Mormon Church) has a very strong conservative view regarding family values. Anything that has anything to do with homosexuality, the Church is against. Of course, as it is with ANY religion in the U.S., they have the right to believe what they want, and to promote what they want.
Anyway, the people voted, gay marriage is illegal in California, and that should've been the end of it. BUT NO! The crazy liberals had to throw a massive temper tantrum!! (as they always do when they don't get their way). I guess the rule of law as it applies to civil elections is only valid when things go their way. It must be fun being a crazy liberal. You just have to be a loud mouth cry baby when you don't get your way. My three year old niece acts the EXACT same way when she doesn't get her way.
I guess they're upset at the LDS Church because they gave a lot of money to the cause of promoting this amendment. It is being made public that they gave (as a Church) a little over $100,000.00. Individual donations from members totaled about $20,000,000.00. What the crazy liberals need to know is that the LDS Church was one of MANY religious and private donors to this cause. The Catholic Church (for example) shares the same exact values as the LDS Church when it comes to family issues, and there are many more Catholics than Mormons. And who cares if the Church gave $100,000,000! It is their right to spend their money how they wish! It sounds like they're also upset that they couldn't get that much money themselves. I don't see how they couldn't. Don't these crazy liberals have George Soros, Ariana Huffington, and all the other wealthy Hollywood celebutards?? What about them? Were they just too cheap to donate to something they say they believe in?
It seems to me that this outcry agaisnt the Church is about more than just Prop 8. The LDS Church is extremely conservative on pretty much every issue you can think of. It is very difficult to be a liberal and to be a member of this Church (I have no idea how Senator Harry Reed does it). It looks like this is a great way for crazy liberals to lash out agaisnt an organization that they may have already hated for years.
Crazy liberals lost this one. They need to stop crying! Do we need some pacifiers?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
